University Transportation Research Center, Region II Friday, September 03, 2010

Research

Completed Project

Assessing Transit Investment Priorities in New York City

February 1st, 2003 - December 29th, 2003

Principal Investigators
Sponsors

This project did not receive matching funds through the University Transportation Centers program.


Reports

Final Report: PDF Transportation Choices and the Future of the New York City Economy

Brief: PDF Research Brief

Working Paper: PDF Estimation of Time and Other Benefits from Nine Proposed Transit Capital Projects In New York City

Journal Article: PDF Evaluation, prioritization and selection of transportation investment projects in New York City

Media Coverage: PDF Weighing Transit Possibilities, New Study Follows the Money

Media Coverage: PDF Transit plans head for a crash

Project publications may be ordered by contacting Dr. Ellen Thorson.


Project Abstract

Over the last decade, a large number of high capital cost transportation projects have been proposed for the New York City Region. Many have resulted from addressing evolving capacity needs, changes in regional demographics and economics, meeting the improvements necessitated by operating century old subway systems and recognizing the impact of moving freight in a dense region. But the catalyst for bringing all of these projects to the attention of the public and all regional agencies was the tragedy of September 11, 2001. While these projects entail massive investments ($50–$60 billion), little analytical work has been carried out to measure the transportation and economic costs and benefits they entail and to categorize them accordingly. Competition among agencies to secure adequate resources to implement any of the desired projects makes such analysis necessary; yet there still remain political, vested economic interests and agency rivalry barriers to achieving this important planning objective.

This project represented a first-of-its-kind effort to assess these competing and complementary projects on a level playing field. It included an indepdent analysis of the project's transportation benefits by the University Transportation Research Center, as well as a parallel effort by the Boston Consulting Group to assess the broader non-transportation economic benefits of the projects.